Charlie’s Angels (2019)

• Year: 2019
• Released: 15 Nov 2019
• Country: Germany, United States
• Adwords: 1 win & 9 nominations
• IMDb: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt5033998/
• Rotten Tomatoes: https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/charlies_angels
• Metacritics: https://www.metacritic.com/movie/charlies-angels
• Available in: 720p, 1080p, 2160p
• Language: English, French, Portuguese, German, Turkish
• MPA Rating: PG-13
• Genre: Action, Adventure, Comedy
• Runtime: 118 min
• Writer: Elizabeth Banks, Evan Spiliotopoulos, David Auburn
• Director: Elizabeth Banks
• Cast: Kristen Stewart, Naomi Scott, Ella Balinska
• Keywords: woman director, duringcreditsstinger, remake, spy, betrayal,

	4.9/10
	52/100
	68% – Critics
	45% – Audience

Charlie’s Angels Storyline

Charlie’s Angels have always provided security and investigative skills to private clients, and now the Charles Townsend Agency has expanded internationally, with the smartest, most fearless, most highly trained women all over the globe – multiple teams of Angels guided by multiple Bosleys taking on the toughest jobs across the world. When a young systems engineer blows the whistle on a dangerous technology, these Angels are called into action, putting their lives on the line to protect us all.

Charlie’s Angels Play trailer

Charlie’s Angels Photos

Charlie’s Angels Torrents Download

Charlie’s Angels Subtitles Download

Charlie’s Angels Movie Reviews

really really bad

I recently watched two charlie’s angels movies from the early 2000’s. figured i’d give them a shot after hating them the first time in theaters. i very much enjoyed them for what they were: ridiculous and outrageous fun. with all the reboots these days i checked and found that a new one was coming out so i added it to my watch list.

this new version is bad in so many ways. it has very little ridiculousness or outrageousness, while at the same time being completely unrealistic. the story was complete nonsense, yet somehow predictable. the dialogue was bad. there was no semblance of characters. most of the comedy was crickets. and there were numerous cringe-y scenes.

it also suffers from what a lot of these female-empowerment movies suffer from lately. the “girl power” theme is just too preachy and in your face. make a good movie with good characters. i obviously wanted to see it knowing most of the cast would be female. but the movie has to not be garbage. don’t even get me started on ocean’s eight. another example where i was excited for this all female version of the movie. and the movie just sucked. and it as very preachy.

in conclusion, movies that have an agenda are generally worse for it. stop making movies for the purpose of female empowerment, and start making good movies with good female characters (1 viewing, 3/11/2020)

Cheap

I had considered four stars. 1. Really weak action scenes. Mostly just flying kicks & takedowns; heavily dependent on camera angle for itsy bitsy believability. Very mundane, seen before, nothing new. 2. Getting really old. The usual car chase that was laughably mundane, and the machine gun – please! Gawd! 3. Usual prop scenes of showing an expensive sports car; club scenes; fashion. 4. Plot nothing new. The same old corporate selling of dangerous device to baddies. Dangerous device could pass as a child’s puzzle toy. Dangerous device fails plausibility & middle school science. 5. Acting & dialogue – sad.

Bring back Lucy Liu, all is forgiven

The beginning to this new possible Charlie’s Angels movie series doesn’t start particularly well, but amazingly it goes downhill from there. I am amazed at the quality of actors they got to star in this piece of junk. Avoid at practically all cost.