Seize Them! (2024)

5.1/10
56% – Critics
false% – Audience

Seize Them! Storyline

Dark Ages Britain where Queen Dagan is toppled by a revolution led by Humble Joan. The Queen becomes a fugitive in her own land, and must face hardship and danger as she embarks on a voyage to win back her throne.

Seize Them! Photos

Seize Them! Torrents Download

720pweb837.21 MBmagnet:?xt=urn:btih:CBB8D672778628B42EC605C554CF73653CE3D9A3
1080pweb1.68 GBmagnet:?xt=urn:btih:085E26BD58FFAE6D7FB4A67C49B7A7482255F617
1080pweb1.52 GBmagnet:?xt=urn:btih:2AF1A68901A417155BE0B66E3B51EBDF66C40A3C

Seize Them! Subtitles Download

Seize Them! Movie Reviews

Silly, low budget, period Brit-com with some bright moments & performances

Though silly, low budget, period Brit-com “Sieze Them” hits nowhere near the Monty Python heights it aspires to, it has its moments and some nice performances. When unpopular Dark Ages queen Aimee Lou Wood (terrific – one to watch) is overthrown by Nicola Coughlan’s peasant army, she’s saved by servant Lolly Adefope (also good) who with poop-shoveller Nick Frost helps her escape across country (to allies (or are they?) Paul Kaye & John Macmillan). Andy Riley’s screenplay is childishly daft (though is def’ly adults only with its language etc) and Curtis Vowell’s direction is basic. This one certainly will not appeal to all, but it has its moments.

Such an oditty

The worst film I’ve watched that I really rather enjoyed. What a strangeness this is. It felt as though the brilliant cast were making something else that didn’t take all that long, so, in their lunchbreaks they made a film on the side. The budget must have been at least £12.50 (ironically the total takings for the 9 o’clock showing not including crisps and a coke) but all that aside, we quite enjoyed it. Sad to say we were the only two in the late showing at our local budget cinema, slightly shocking considering it was the opening night.

Can’t see films like this being the saviour of the silver screen.

I think the unnecessary gore and swearyness could easily have been cut and the film could have been a PG rather than a 15 opening up a much larger Easter holiday audience.

Why?

Why?

This would have been a fun film for youg (ish) kids, so why add swearing – there really was no need and it’s not the sort of film that would appeal to an older audience – although, because of the swearing, it’s rated 15. Having said that I laughed twice.

I can confirm that there was a plot, there was acting and, possibly, some direction. It felt like a prolonged TV sketch – put in the rack and tortured, until it was mistakenly let go.

I am mystified why this was released into cinemas – maybe to test its commercial viability, but as I was the only person in the cinema the answer to that is clear.