Salinger (2013)

• Year: 2013
• Released: 05 Sep 2013
• Country: United States
• Adwords: 2 nominations
• IMDb: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1596753/
• Rotten Tomatoes: https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/salinger
• Metacritics:
• Available in: 720p,
• Language: English
• MPA Rating: PG-13
• Genre: Documentary
• Runtime: 120 min
• Writer: N/A
• Director: Shane Salerno
• Cast: Philip Seymour Hoffman, Edward Norton, Judd Apatow
• Keywords: new york city, based on novel or book, world war ii, biography, older man younger woman relationship, docudrama,

	6.7/10
	40/100
	37% – Critics
	false% – Audience

Salinger Storyline

An unprecedented look inside the private world of J.D. Salinger, the reclusive author of The Catcher in the Rye.

Salinger Photos

Salinger Torrents Download

Salinger Subtitles Download

Salinger Movie Reviews

Good Biopic, A Bit Long

An unprecedented look inside the private world of J.D. Salinger, the reclusive author of The Catcher in the Rye.

I didn’t know very much about J. D. Salinger, and frankly was not a huge fan of “Catcher” (though perhaps I should revisit it). That being said, this was an interesting look at a literary giant. I loved the WWII aspects, and I had no idea about Oona O’Neill; her relationship with Chaplin is legendary, but Salinger, too? The film’s biggest weakness is that it could probably be trimmed by a good thirty minutes. Much of the running time is focused on actors commenting on Salinger and his work. I understand that they provide a name to help ell the documentary, but their opinions dob’t really have any value if they never met the man.

Interesting, eye-opening, documentary

Interesting, eye-opening, documentary on the great novelist JD Salinger. Well-researched, it includes details of his life that weren’t widely known.

Has the usual documentary stuff: a linear blow-by-blow account of his life, including some the more pivotal events and how they later affected him. Quite fascinating how his character is shaped, and how he then puts some aspects of his own character, and experiences, into his writing.

However, it’s not all wine and roses and only positivity. All aspects of Salinger’s life are revealed, and some will surprise you. Perfect he was not.

On the down side, I felt that most of the interviews with stars were unnecessary. They really didn’t have much to add and were just there as a cheerleader squad.

Very interesting and well worth watching.

Some critics really missed the point

A recurring complaint I’ve read about this movie (I’m more of a movie girl than a film girl, which made it even stranger I’d enjoy a documentary so much) is that it doesn’t spend near enough time of Salinger’s work itself. Yet that would defeat a lot of the film’s unwavering purpose.

A veritable sea of interpretations and impressions of Salinger’s published works exist, it is the enigma of the man that is the question, and some of his writing has taken on such an epic and larger-than-the-author stature that even delving in a little would give this film a much different feel, and not in a good way.

I wonder if even a portion of the reasons that Salinger kept so much so to himself and guarded his privacy so very jealousy had to do with that larger-than-the-author reaction, where so much of one’s self could be open to misinterpretation based on your art, just as we see in tabloid press about very famous actors, musicians, aristocrats, the extremely wealthy, and whose persona rather than personalities are what are worshipped or disdained.

Salinger is one of those exceedingly rare artists (Kubrick and Bardot are the only ones that come to mind) that basically said, nah, I’m not playing the game. You get some of my art, the rest is for myself or my descendents to choose what to do with, but you don’t get me.

8/10