Shank (2010)

• Year: 2010
• Released: 26 Mar 2010
• Country: United Kingdom
• Adwords: N/A
• IMDb: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1320296/
• Rotten Tomatoes: https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/shank
• Metacritics:
• Available in: 720p, 1080p,
• Language: English
• MPA Rating: Unrated
• Genre: Action, Comedy, Crime
• Runtime: 90 min
• Writer: Paul Van Carter
• Director: Mo Ali
• Cast: Kedar Williams-Stirling, Adam Deacon, Ashley Thomas
• Keywords:

	3.9/10
	9% – Critics
	32% – Audience

Shank Storyline

Set in a dystopic future London in 2015, where society has fallen apart, gangs have taken over and the economy is in complete anarchy. The story follows Junior and his older brother, Rager, who are in charge of a local gang, “The Paper Chaserz”. They try to stay out of trouble and refuse to kill as part of their ‘moral code’, which is especially enforced by the strong but defensive Rager. Rager leads his gang, “The Paper Chaserz” and they plan to steal goods out of a local van. The robbery is successful, but a rival gang called The Soldiers, who are notorious and bloodthirsty in trying to take-over all other postcodes in the London area, attempt a theft. The “Paper Chaserz” escape, except for Junior who is stranded and cornered by The Soldiers. Rager reappears and saves his brother by beating all the rival gang members, telling Junior to leave. As Junior flees, Rager is attacked by the crews leader Tugz, who stabs Rager in the back multiple times. Junior now teams up with the rest of his gang to get revenge on The Soldiers. The gang meets a trio of girls named Ree Ree, Tash, and Little Lexy, who agree to help them as they also have a reason to get revenge against Tugz.—Sandeep Shetty

Shank Photos

Shank Torrents Download

Shank Subtitles Download

Shank Movie Reviews

A great movie to walk out to.

Walking out of a film half an hour before the end is a gesture I used to abhor. No matter how rancid a film appears to be, you should always see it through once you’ve started. Otherwise you’re not quite in a position to properly criticise it.

I’ve changed my mind innit. Shank was profoundly unwatchable. I saw it in a theatre with maybe another 50 people; I could hear sighs and groans coming from all directions throughout the picture. Every macho posture, every tedious shouting match, every useless camera jerk, every inept stylistic manoeuvre seemed to audibly destroy a part of someone in there. Myself included, which is why I got the hell outta there.

I haven’t seen Bullet Boy or Kidulthood, two other London-set youth violence epics which apparently bear a resemblance to this dirge, so I cannot compare them. I can only say that Shank is a stain on the good name of film. It consists of scene after scene of fantastically unappealing teen anti-heroes yelling at each other in grimy surroundings, punctuated by the occasional flashy chase scene or, in one instance, a dogfight captured in outdated computer graphics. Despite the digitally-enhanced nature of this scene, we don’t actually see the dogs fighting, just about 5 minutes of close-ups of the deliriously screaming spectators – the film actually goes out of its way to be boring and repetitive; I simply cannot believe that this was an accident or oversight.

I kinda have a thing for Kaya Scodelario, and the promise of her presence may have been the deciding factor in making me go to see this mush. But she couldn’t save it for me; she didn’t even show up until the film had battered me senseless for over an hour, and by then I had already accepted that the useless script wasn’t gonna give her a chance to display the spunk and sex appeal she delivered in Skins. This useless film wouldn’t even let Kaya be spunky and sexy! I walked out shortly after she showed up, when it became clear she was there only for the lead actors to harass her a little bit.

I’m pretty much finished now. Thank you for reading. And please don’t give the makers of Shank any of your hard-earned, or even hard-benefited cash. They must learn to try harder.

Posturing rip-off

With an opening sequence copied from DISTRICT 13 and an entire storyline and setting copied from KIDULTHOOD, there’s nothing remotely original about SHANK. It juts and jumps all over the place, telling a storyline of revenge and brotherhood that’s been done to death a zillion times already. It makes you feel like this particular genre of gritty, London-set gangster film is dead in the water, although a film came along a year later that proved there was still life in the genre yet: I’m talking about 2011’s ATTACK THE BLOCK, of course.

Sadly, SHANK is nothing like ATTACK THE BLOCK. The script is dead-headed stupid, the characters clichéd and the frenzied editing actually nausea-inducing. The obnoxious leading characters are repulsive in the extreme and their quest to undertake revenge seems to go absolutely nowhere; by the time the film ends, absolutely nothing has happened to any of them. There are no character arcs whatsoever.

I don’t know what’s worse, actually: Paul Van Carter’s wannabe-hip script or Mo Ali’s drug-addled direction. Put together they provide a nauseating example of all that’s wrong with British cinema when a successful film comes along and the inevitable rip-offs follow.

Rubbish Kidulthood Rip Off

Menhaj Huda & Noel Clarke have a lot to answer for because without the success of their 2006 film Kidulthood this piece of crap would never had seen the light of day.

The worst thing is we’ll be seeing a lot more of this kind of thing as people – I don’t know who – are paying to see this, having opened to Top Ten Box-Office in its first week.

I guess I was warned in the opening credits of this film it wouldn’t amount to much. How so, well, it features a man taking a dump in the street and thats how I felt having sat through all 90 Minutes.

What I’d like to know is what the likes of Colin Salmon & Robbie Gee were thinking to be associated with this.

Set in a future London that looks a lot like, well, the city today. I’m guessing its supposed to say something about “Urban” life & the street. Ya get me!!

The film I assume is trying to tell the viewer that violence is bad however everything it says the opposite. A dog fight played out as a video game & theft is alright as long as its for your “Fam”. Even the climatic fight at the films end is botched cop out.

As I said before we are going to see a lot more of this kind of thing before we see any decent Urban set films.

Don’t bother to pay good money to see this don’t even get it on DVD. Wait to it shown on TV hopefully at about 1am on a cold Wednesday night.

Absolutely rubbish.

http://www.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=14198203